(Fol, 1884)
Presence of a suboral cone both in Codonella cistellula and in Codonella? perforata (well-developed in the former, smooth in the latter) thought to indicate relationship between these two genera.
Ref.: Balech (1962b).
(Fol, 1884)
Presence of a suboral cone both in Codonella cistellula and in Codonella? perforata (well-developed in the former, smooth in the latter) thought to indicate relationship between these two genera.
Ref.: Balech (1962b).
%LABEL% (%SOURCE%)